Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Chapter assignments by Region Consultant"
From PhiSigmaPiWiki
(New page: I created this page because I figured that this information changed frequently enough (and is a needed reference) to warrant it being on the wiki. What do you all think? if we keep this up...) |
Pmgingrich (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I created this page because I figured that this information changed frequently enough (and is a needed reference) to warrant it being on the wiki. What do you all think? if we keep this up, would there be a way to lock this page for editing only by National Staff? [[User:Rdeguzman|Rdeguzman]] 16:14, 14 August 2008 (PDT) | I created this page because I figured that this information changed frequently enough (and is a needed reference) to warrant it being on the wiki. What do you all think? if we keep this up, would there be a way to lock this page for editing only by National Staff? [[User:Rdeguzman|Rdeguzman]] 16:14, 14 August 2008 (PDT) | ||
| + | : Moderators can lock pages (Pete, Fresh, myself) but usuaully we keep that for content like Risk Management that people could put up harmful advice in. If someone changes around consultants we can fix that easily. FYI each region has the consultants listed, although they need to be updated for this year. This format may be better though. ([[User:Jonah|Jonah]] 18:01, 14 August 2008 (PDT)) | ||
| + | :: I think this might be better from two standpoints: (1) Easier to update (one page vs 12), (2) there are many instances where different chapters in a region have different consultants, so this is a somewhat cleaner format. If we go with this methodology though, we should probably delete it from the region pages so that we have it in one spot to maintain. Any objections to that? ([[User:Pmgingrich|Pmgingrich]] 12:42, 15 August 2008 (PDT)) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:42, 15 August 2008
I created this page because I figured that this information changed frequently enough (and is a needed reference) to warrant it being on the wiki. What do you all think? if we keep this up, would there be a way to lock this page for editing only by National Staff? Rdeguzman 16:14, 14 August 2008 (PDT)
- Moderators can lock pages (Pete, Fresh, myself) but usuaully we keep that for content like Risk Management that people could put up harmful advice in. If someone changes around consultants we can fix that easily. FYI each region has the consultants listed, although they need to be updated for this year. This format may be better though. (Jonah 18:01, 14 August 2008 (PDT))
- I think this might be better from two standpoints: (1) Easier to update (one page vs 12), (2) there are many instances where different chapters in a region have different consultants, so this is a somewhat cleaner format. If we go with this methodology though, we should probably delete it from the region pages so that we have it in one spot to maintain. Any objections to that? (Pmgingrich 12:42, 15 August 2008 (PDT))
