Talk:Members

From PhiSigmaPiWiki
Revision as of 15:41, 14 March 2007 by Duff (talk | contribs)

Use this page for talk about general formatting for all Member pages.

Why not make this a category page (like the one already started for members)? It would seem that any list of members would be in alphabetical order, so a category page would make most sense. Also to take into consideration--would it be alphabetical by first name or by last name? Unlike other pages where you can have the list page & a category page, this seems to make sense as only the category page.{Duff 18:32, 14 March 2007 (EDT)}

Well the page you're describing, I might call "List of Members." I envision this page talking about what a member is, types (classes) of membership, with links to other pages about Alumni Members, Honorary Members, etc. Article pages (like this one) should have content. Category pages are lists of Article pages (or other category pages) that are tagged with category tags. Make sense? FreshBoy 18:36, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
I understand how you were setting it up. My next question then is about the nature of the wiki. How much is going to be posted that really has nothing people can add to? For example, the page with the different type of memberships isn't something that will likely be changed (unless constitutional amendment), so what is the purpose of that being on the wiki? Maybe you have a different idea about input that could be added to that page, but the question applies to any page added--even if it won't change, will it be added? NOTE: I understand some pages are added for history sake so others can fill them in with information that isn't currently available.{Duff 18:41, 14 March 2007 (EDT)}