Difference between revisions of "Writing National Constitution Amendments"

From PhiSigmaPiWiki
(took out some opinion, corrected spelling, added block motion)
(removed subjective comments, fixed spelling)
Line 1: Line 1:
The National Constitution, as a document, employs specific style conventions to promote clarity and cohesiveness. In authoring proposed amendments to the National Constitution, it is helpful to be aware of these style conventions, so that the language in the amendment proposals matches the language prevalent throughout the Constitution. When amendment proposals which deviate from these conventions are brought before the Grand Chapter for consideration, it is common for the Grand Chapter to focus on the stylistic abnormalities, and often debate on the underlying issue is lost.  
+
The National Constitution, as a document, employs specific style conventions to promote clarity and cohesiveness. In authoring proposed amendments to the National Constitution, it is helpful to be aware of these style conventions, so that the language in the amendment proposals matches the language prevalent throughout the Constitution.  
  
 
This guide is intended to be a style resource for anyone authoring a proposed amendment to the National Constitution. Following the simple guidelines below will help ensure that the Grand Chapter debates the merit of your amendment proposal, and not the style.
 
This guide is intended to be a style resource for anyone authoring a proposed amendment to the National Constitution. Following the simple guidelines below will help ensure that the Grand Chapter debates the merit of your amendment proposal, and not the style.
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
==Terminology==
 
==Terminology==
Be consistent. There are several instances in the National Constitution, the National Operating Policies and the National Interpretive Document where terminology is applied inconsistently. Inconsistent use of terminology only creates confusion; it may also invalidate the particular clauses in which they are found, rendering them unenforceable or meaningless.
+
Be consistent. One example is the term “Initiated” being used for “Inducted.” Although the terms may be closely related, “Inducted” refers to the conference of Membership through the use of the Ritual. “Initiated” refers to the process of participating in a Collegiate Chapter’s Initiation Program.
 
 
One example is the term “Initiated” being used for “Inducted.” Although the terms may be closely related, “Inducted” refers to the conference of Membership through the use of the Ritual. “Initiated” refers to the process of participating in a Collegiate Chapter’s Initiation Program.
 
  
 
==Using Parallel Structure==
 
==Using Parallel Structure==
Line 25: Line 23:
  
 
=Formatting=
 
=Formatting=
When writing an amendment proposal, think about how you are formatting the new text. Minor formatting issues, such as extra spaces, typographical errors, and miused marks of punctuation, may be corrected by the National Secretary when in corporating the changes into the National Constitution, '''so long as they do not change the meaning of the amendment'''.  
+
When writing an amendment proposal, think about how you are formatting the new text. Minor formatting issues, such as extra spaces, typographical errors, and misused marks of punctuation, may be corrected by the National Secretary when incorporating the changes into the National Constitution, '''so long as they do not change the meaning of the amendment'''.  
  
 
==Order==
 
==Order==

Revision as of 15:35, 11 March 2007

The National Constitution, as a document, employs specific style conventions to promote clarity and cohesiveness. In authoring proposed amendments to the National Constitution, it is helpful to be aware of these style conventions, so that the language in the amendment proposals matches the language prevalent throughout the Constitution.

This guide is intended to be a style resource for anyone authoring a proposed amendment to the National Constitution. Following the simple guidelines below will help ensure that the Grand Chapter debates the merit of your amendment proposal, and not the style.

Textual Conventions

Because particular terms may have different (albeit related) meanings, Phi Sigma Pi has adopted several textual conventions in our governing documents intended to clarify which specific meaning of the term is being expressed.

Capitalization

Use caps only when needed. The term “Member” (note the capital letter ‘M’ at the beginning of the term) is used throughout the National Constitution to denote membership in Phi Sigma Pi. Occasionally, the term “member” (without the capital beginning) appears in the document, in cases where it does not refer to membership in Phi Sigma Pi.

It is important to differentiate “Membership” in Phi Sigma Pi from “membership” in other senses to avoid confusion. Other terms that follow this convention which have been used erroneously include: “Active” vs. “active” (also “Inactive” vs. “inactive”) and derivations thereof; “Alumni” vs. “alumni,” “Chapter” vs. “chapter,” and “Collegiate” vs. “collegiate.”

Terminology

Be consistent. One example is the term “Initiated” being used for “Inducted.” Although the terms may be closely related, “Inducted” refers to the conference of Membership through the use of the Ritual. “Initiated” refers to the process of participating in a Collegiate Chapter’s Initiation Program.

Using Parallel Structure

The National Constitution makes use of parallelism in structure. When writing proposed amendments, it is helpful to mirror this parallel structure for clarity.

Examples

  • Parallelism in Articles: Article VIII: Duties of the National Officers is divided into sections for each office, with duties listed as items within each section. Article XI: Chapter Officers is similarly divided.
  • Parallelism in Terminology: Article VIII: Duties of the National Officers lists each duty in a parallel form, starting with the primary verb relating to the relevant duty.

Formatting

When writing an amendment proposal, think about how you are formatting the new text. Minor formatting issues, such as extra spaces, typographical errors, and misused marks of punctuation, may be corrected by the National Secretary when incorporating the changes into the National Constitution, so long as they do not change the meaning of the amendment.

Order

If you are adding an article or a section, make sure that you are putting it in the right place. Some things to consider:

  • Does the new text pertain to an Individual Member, Alumni Chapters, Collegiate Chapters (or both Alumni and Collegiate Chapters), another Alumni Organization, the National Council, or something else? No matte what the answer is, first examine every article containing information pertaining to your amendment proposal.
  • Is your amendment proposal general or specific? General items usually come near the beginning of the document, with specific items following.
  • Does your amendment proposal address more than one article or section? If you are adding, deleting, or modifying several sections of the document, it may make sense to combine those sections as a block motion, or to reorder other sections of the document.

Help with figuring out where to place new text, or how to combine or reorder articles or sections of the National Constitution can be obtained from the Constitution & Chapter Standards Committee. See the section on Further Resources below.

Completeness

  • coming soon!

Further Resources

The Constitution & Chapter Standards Committee is always available to assist you in drafting your amendment proposals. Contact Senior Vice President Lisa A. Ambrosia Howard (SeniorVP@PhiSigmaPi.org) with questions.