Difference between revisions of "Initiation Program Review"
From PhiSigmaPiWiki
Pmgingrich (talk | contribs) (formatting consistency) |
(added footer) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Risk Management|Back to main Risk Management Guide page]] | [[Resource Guide|Back to main Resource Guide page]] | [[Risk Management|Back to main Risk Management Guide page]] | [[Resource Guide|Back to main Resource Guide page]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{Resource Guides Footer}} | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Resource Guides]] | [[Category:Resource Guides]] | ||
[[Category:Risk Management Resource Guide]] | [[Category:Risk Management Resource Guide]] | ||
Revision as of 13:30, 14 October 2008
Each term your chapter should conduct a review of its initiation program to ensure all activities, events and tasks are free from any elements that are considered hazing. Use the following questions as a guide when your chapter conducts a review of your initiation program. If you answer no to any question, the activity should be eliminated or re-evaluated.
- Is this activity an educational experience?
- Does this activity promote and conform to the ideal and values of Phi Sigma Pi?
- Will this activity increase initiate’s respect for Phi Sigma Pi and its members?
- Is it an activity that initiates and members can participate in together?
- Would you be willing to allow the University President to witness this activity?
- Does the activity have value?
- Would you be able to defend it in a court of law?
Back to main Risk Management Guide page | Back to main Resource Guide page
