Difference between revisions of "Initiation Program Review"

From PhiSigmaPiWiki
(added footer)
(removed old footer)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Would you be able to defend it in a court of law?
 
* Would you be able to defend it in a court of law?
  
 
----
 
[[Risk Management|Back to main Risk Management Guide page]] | [[Resource Guide|Back to main Resource Guide page]]
 
  
  

Revision as of 15:23, 17 December 2008

Each term your chapter should conduct a review of its initiation program to ensure all activities, events and tasks are free from any elements that are considered hazing. Use the following questions as a guide when your chapter conducts a review of your initiation program. If you answer no to any question, the activity should be eliminated or re-evaluated.


  • Is this activity an educational experience?
  • Does this activity promote and conform to the ideal and values of Phi Sigma Pi?
  • Will this activity increase initiate’s respect for Phi Sigma Pi and its members?
  • Is it an activity that initiates and members can participate in together?
  • Would you be willing to allow the University President to witness this activity?
  • Does the activity have value?
  • Would you be able to defend it in a court of law?


Resource Guides
Alumni Development · Chapter Awards · Chapter Finance and Fundraising · Inter-Chapter Events and Relations · Membership Development · Public Relations · Risk Management · Scholarship · Service and TFA Programming · Social · Writing National Constitution Amendments
Chapter Officer Training Guides
President · Vice President · Historian · Parliamentarian · Recruitment Advisor · Initiate Advisor · Secretary · Treasurer · General Officer