Initiation Voting

From PhiSigmaPiWiki
Revision as of 21:44, 17 January 2009 by Patrickdherron (talk | contribs)

Voting on Prospective Members

Each prospective member is to be considered and voted on individually, on their merits as a potential member. Brothers should remember that the initiation program is not a personality or popularity contest; rather, it is about preparing the future members of the chapter. A helpful way to approach this voting process is to set aside the question, “Are they a good person?”, and instead ask, “Will they make a good brother?”

Voting on Prospective Initiates

Voting on prospective initiates is commonly referred to as a “bid vote” or “rush vote.” The minimum vote for a prospective member to be promoted to initiate is a simple Majority, UNLESS the chapter includes in its chapter by-laws a requirement that a higher level is needed, such as two-thirds.

If any of the prospective member motions fail, the brothers should be consulted as to why. Additional motions to reconsider individual prospective members may be necessary (so long as they follow the guidelines for reconsideration), or other actions may be needed. For no reason should the list of prospective members be approved or accepted without a chapter vote.
Example of voting on prospective initiates

Voting on Initiates for Induction

Voting on initiates is commonly referred to as a "final vote." The minimum vote for a initiate is a 3/4 vote of Active members of the chapter.

Any initiate who has not met the national and local requirements for initiation is not eligible for induction. Therefore, he or she should not be considered or voted on.

Additionally, always bear in mind the 48-hour rule laid out in the National Constitution, which requires that all voting on initiates be completed at least 48 hours prior to the Formal Induction. Example of voting on initiates for induction

Disclaimer

All content submitted to the Phi Sigma Pi Wiki-based Resource Guides is considered the shared property of Phi Sigma Pi and its members. Please do not submit content unless you are comfortable that it may be edited, amended, altered or removed by other contributors. Malevolent destruction of content and/or posting of blatantly inappropriate content may be considered conduct unbecoming a brother.

Content that is likely to be considered unacceptable and inappropriate includes, but is not limited to: content relating to illegal activities of any kind, or activities prohibited by Phi Sigma Pi or University Rules or Regulations, references to (legal or illegal) use of alcohol or drugs, sexually explicit material or references and/or content describing or promoting hazing, discrimination, or harassment of any kind.

The appearance of external hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by Phi Sigma Pi of the linked web sites, or the information contained therein. Phi Sigma Pi does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Any external hyperlinks should conform to the rules as outlined in Editing FAQs otherwise they may be removed. Inappropriate adding of external hyperlinks may be considered conduct unbecoming a brother.

All content in the Resource Guides should be considered as advice only, and no content or advice should be followed if in conflict with the Phi Sigma Pi National Constitution, University Regulations, or state, local, or federal law.

Resource Guides
Alumni Development · Chapter Awards · Chapter Finance and Fundraising · Inter-Chapter Events and Relations · Membership Development · Public Relations · Risk Management · Scholarship · Service and TFA Programming · Social · Writing National Constitution Amendments
Chapter Officer Training Guides
President · Vice President · Historian · Parliamentarian · Recruitment Advisor · Initiate Advisor · Secretary · Treasurer · General Officer