Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emily Specchio"
From PhiSigmaPiWiki
Pmgingrich (talk | contribs) (→Suggesting for Featured Article) |
(→move Graham's info) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I tracked down the roll number and added it. I will also ask a few Alpha Rho brothers to review the page to see if they can further enhance it before 3/25/07. [[User:Pmgingrich|Pmgingrich]] 18:41, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | :I tracked down the roll number and added it. I will also ask a few Alpha Rho brothers to review the page to see if they can further enhance it before 3/25/07. [[User:Pmgingrich|Pmgingrich]] 18:41, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == move Graham's info == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Instead of listing bio info for her big and littles, why not move that info to a bio page for those individuals. ([[User:Jonah|Jonah]] 15:57, 26 March 2007 (EDT)) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That seems reasonable to me, I was just trying to follow the format of the member template. This might be something to consider changing in the template. | ||
| + | :: Good point, I didn't realize that was what you are doing. Definitely agree, if it is in the template like that we should probably change it. ([[User:Jonah|Jonah]] 16:50, 26 March 2007 (EDT)) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 26 March 2007
Suggesting for Featured Article
I think that this article should be the next featured article on the Main Page. I would prefer to find Emily's Roll number first, though, but will probably move forward even without it on Sunday 3/25/07, if there are no objections. FreshBoy 10:48, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- I tracked down the roll number and added it. I will also ask a few Alpha Rho brothers to review the page to see if they can further enhance it before 3/25/07. Pmgingrich 18:41, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
move Graham's info
Instead of listing bio info for her big and littles, why not move that info to a bio page for those individuals. (Jonah 15:57, 26 March 2007 (EDT))
- That seems reasonable to me, I was just trying to follow the format of the member template. This might be something to consider changing in the template.
- Good point, I didn't realize that was what you are doing. Definitely agree, if it is in the template like that we should probably change it. (Jonah 16:50, 26 March 2007 (EDT))
